Hyphenate or Die!

admin

Maybe I got a little carried away on this one, but I’ve seen so much garbage about this across the Web that I feel compelled to set the record straight with some evidence. Evidence in SEO is something that most folks fail to provide when they make claims. So, part of the reason I started this blog was to run counter to the unfounded heap of SEO advice that the web is awash with. If I can’t convince you with my posts, then I probably won’t even bother to try.

There are good reasons to use a hyphen when naming files on your web site. Google treats underscores as “word characters” which means that it is an extra alpha character in the a-z A-Z range. Imagine that it is a new character that follows the letter Z and that any time it’s used, it is essentially like placing another letter in a series of letters, so that “the_real_deal” becomes one word instead of three, and really becomes nonsensical as such. The same thing happens with your file names if you use underscores. Hyphens are treated as “non-word characters” by Google, so that when you use a hyphen between the words in a document name, Google parses out each word as if the hyphen were a space. Here are some compelling reasons to believe that you should hyphenate or die:

Underscoring the Underscore with Scorn

Underscoring the Underscore with Scorn

The Real Deal with Hyphenation

The Real Deal with Hyphenation

The Version without Hyphens or Underscores has the Same Results and the Hyphenated Version

The Version without Hyphens or Underscores has the Same Results and the Hyphenated Version

Here’s a case where a picture is worth way more than a thousand words. How about 101,000,000 results for the-real-deal compared to 91,000 for the_real_deal. Notice how the hyphenated search returns dictionary linked terms for real and deal? The underscore version doesn’t because Google does not read it as three words. If Google doesn’t read your query as three words, do you think you’re document names will be seen differently? That wouldn’t make sense would it?

It that’s not enough to convince you, maybe Mr. Cutts can:

This video was embedded using the YouTuber plugin by Roy Tanck. Adobe Flash Player is required to view the video.

VN:F [1.7.0_948]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.7.0_948]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
Share and SEOgOES:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay
  • FriendFeed
  • LinkedIn
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites
Oct
10

4 Responses to “Hyphenate or Die!”

  1. Other variant is possible also

    UN:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    UN:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  2. admin says:

    This is certainly true.

    UA:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    UA:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  3. then why digg page it full of underscore and giving better result and 1st page in google

    UN:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    UN:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  4. admin says:

    I never meant to say that by containing underscores a URL had no chance of ranking in top positions. Quite to the contrary, there are many examples where this happens. However, there are several factors underlying this rank that are strong enough to establish the site for it’s particular rank. The underscore, in my opinion, does not help the rank, but it won’t necessarily hurt the rank either. It simply does not add to the strength of the overall rank. SEO factors are mostly additive. Absence of one factor does not equate to a loss in rank, but rather an unrealized opportunity to improve rank. It’s not surprising that digg.com URLs can rank with underscores in the URLs. I did notice that on much of the site that the URLs actually use hyphens. This is true of their blog URLs as well.

    Thanks for pointing this out, as my post could use the clarification. I have to admit my writing style for this post was meant to take an extremist tone, which was meant to be humorous, but nevertheless support a serious assertion.

    UA:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)
    UA:F [1.7.0_948]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Leave a Reply