<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SEO GOES</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seogoes.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seogoes.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization &#38; Visibility Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:10:35 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Hyphenate or Die! by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoes.com/2009/10/hyphenate-or-die/comment-page-1/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoes.com/?p=42#comment-128</guid>
		<description>I never meant to say that by containing underscores a URL had no chance of ranking in top positions. Quite to the contrary, there are many examples where this happens. However, there are several factors underlying this rank that are strong enough to establish the site for it&#039;s particular rank. The underscore, in my opinion, does not help the rank, but it won&#039;t necessarily hurt the rank either. It simply does not add to the strength of the overall rank. SEO factors are mostly additive. Absence of one factor does not equate to a loss in rank, but rather an unrealized opportunity to improve rank. It&#039;s not surprising that digg.com URLs can rank with underscores in the URLs. I did notice that on much of the site that the URLs actually use hyphens. This is true of their blog URLs as well. 

Thanks for pointing this out, as my post could use the clarification. I have to admit my writing style for this post was meant to take an extremist tone, which was meant to be humorous, but nevertheless support a serious assertion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never meant to say that by containing underscores a URL had no chance of ranking in top positions. Quite to the contrary, there are many examples where this happens. However, there are several factors underlying this rank that are strong enough to establish the site for it&#8217;s particular rank. The underscore, in my opinion, does not help the rank, but it won&#8217;t necessarily hurt the rank either. It simply does not add to the strength of the overall rank. SEO factors are mostly additive. Absence of one factor does not equate to a loss in rank, but rather an unrealized opportunity to improve rank. It&#8217;s not surprising that digg.com URLs can rank with underscores in the URLs. I did notice that on much of the site that the URLs actually use hyphens. This is true of their blog URLs as well. </p>
<p>Thanks for pointing this out, as my post could use the clarification. I have to admit my writing style for this post was meant to take an extremist tone, which was meant to be humorous, but nevertheless support a serious assertion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hyphenate or Die! by pondicherry times</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoes.com/2009/10/hyphenate-or-die/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>pondicherry times</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoes.com/?p=42#comment-116</guid>
		<description>then why digg page it full of underscore and giving better result and 1st page in google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>then why digg page it full of underscore and giving better result and 1st page in google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hyphenate or Die! by admin</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoes.com/2009/10/hyphenate-or-die/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoes.com/?p=42#comment-16</guid>
		<description>This is certainly true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is certainly true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Hyphenate or Die! by Rinuiptthatty</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoes.com/2009/10/hyphenate-or-die/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Rinuiptthatty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoes.com/?p=42#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Other variant is possible also</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other variant is possible also</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Online Collaboration Tools &#124; Web 2.1 by sneha</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoes.com/2009/10/collaboration-tools-list/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>sneha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoes.com/?p=16#comment-12</guid>
		<description>The problem with the folks like Google &amp; Yahoo is that they have created many tools which have been loosely coupled. The challenge with such a solution is that the the information gets locked into multiple silos. With Google Wave they are trying to integrate all the conversations (discussions) but what would be truly desirable is a platform built form ground up using social networking at the base and business apps on top of it. I have tried Injoos Teamware (www.injoos.com) and found it captures both informal and formal knowledge like documents in one single workspace on the cloud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with the folks like Google &amp; Yahoo is that they have created many tools which have been loosely coupled. The challenge with such a solution is that the the information gets locked into multiple silos. With Google Wave they are trying to integrate all the conversations (discussions) but what would be truly desirable is a platform built form ground up using social networking at the base and business apps on top of it. I have tried Injoos Teamware (www.injoos.com) and found it captures both informal and formal knowledge like documents in one single workspace on the cloud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Analytics Tool: ClickTale Reconstructs User Experience by Sally Earl</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoes.com/2009/10/analytics-tool-clicktale-reconstructs-user-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Earl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoes.com/?p=134#comment-9</guid>
		<description>A  gem indeed -  im hooked!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A  gem indeed &#8211;  im hooked!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on About by Google-TCW</title>
		<link>http://www.seogoes.com/about/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Google-TCW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 16:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seogoes.com/?page_id=2#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hi from google Google-TCW</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi from google Google-TCW</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
